Some Comments about Being a Philosopher of Color and the Reasons I Didn’t Write a (Real) Paper for this (Seemingly) Ideal Venue for My Work

Author(s)Sean A. Valles
JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Thematic Cluster/Special IssueTrump and the 2016 Election
AbstractThis special issue conspicuously lacks work by Philosophers of Color (with the exception of this commentary). I have been given this opportunity to discuss the impediments that kept me from submitting my relevant work, offered as a small step toward recognizing the impediments faced by other Philosophers of Color. I highlight factors including direct and indirect consequences of a disproportionately White community of US philosophers, and some underrecognized risk-reward calculations that Philosophers of Color face when choosing an article project. I urge further discussion of the topic, starting with an exhortation to choose the right phenomenon and accordingly frame the right question: Why are White philosophers deliberating the “ethical and social issues arising out of the 2016 US presidential election” in a prestigious journal, while Philosophers of Color are deliberating the same issues in tense classrooms, closed offices, and on-/off-campus forums?
KeywordsPhilosophers of Color; 2016 US election; Trump administration; Academic philosophy
This content was generated by artificial intelligence using the text of the original work.
Date Published July 20, 2017
Volume27
Issue2
Pages1-11
URLhttps://kiej.georgetown.edu/comments-philosopher-color-reasons-didnt-write-real-paper-seemingly-ideal-venue-work/
Google Scholar Linkhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Some+Comments+about+Being+a+Philosopher+of+Color+and+the+Reasons+I+Didn%E2%80%99t+Write+a+%28Real%29+Paper+for+This+%28Seemingly%29+Ideal+Venue+for+My+Work.&btnG=
Open Access?Yes

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.