Indexing Philosophy in a Fair and Inclusive Key

Author(s)Simon Fokt, Quentin Pharr, Clotilde Torregrossa
JournalJournal of the American Philosophical Association
AbstractExisting indexing systems used to arrange philosophical works have been shown to misrepresent the discipline in ways that reflect and perpetuate exclusionary attitudes within it. In recent years, there has been a great deal of effort to challenge those attitudes and to revise them. But as the discipline moves toward greater equality and inclusivity, the way it has indexed its work has unfortunately not. To course correct, we identify in this article some of the specific changes that are needed within current indexing systems and propose a new model that could embody them. We use the Diversity Reading List in Philosophy as a case study and PhilPapers as a basis for comparison. The model we propose not only represents the discipline in a more inclusive and fair way, but it is also efficient, easy to use or implement, and adaptable for a variety of contexts.
Keywordsinformation, organization, metaphilosophy, inclusivity, user efficiency, Diversity Reading List in Philosophy, PhilPapers
Date Published April 14, 2023
Google Scholar Link,39
Open Access?Yes

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.