| Chapter Author(s) | Mary Ellen Waithe |
| Book/Edited Volume Title | Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy |
| Editor(s) | Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir; Ruth Edith Hagengruber |
| Pages | 3-17 |
| Abstract | In “Sex, Lies, and Bigotry: The Canon of Philosophy” I explore several questions: What does it mean for our understanding of the history of philosophy that women philosophers have been left out and are now being retrieved? What kind of a methodology of the history of philosophy does the recovery of women philosophers imply? Whether and how excluded women philosophers have been included in philosophy? Whether and how feminist philosophy and the history of women philosophers are related? I also explore the questions “Are there any themes or arguments that are common to many women philosophers?” and “Does inclusion of women in the canon require a reconfiguration of philosophical inquiry?” I argue that it is either ineptness or simple bigotry that led most historians of philosophy to intentionally omit women’s contributions from their histories and that such failure replicated itself in the university curricula of recent centuries and can be remedied by suspending for the next two centuries the teaching of men’s contributions to the discipline and teaching works by women only. As an alternative to this drastic and undoubtedly unpopular solution, I propose expanding the length and number of courses in the philosophy curriculum to include discussion of women’s contributions. |
| Keywords | |
| Date Published | July 12, 2020 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Volume | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1 |
| ISBN | 978-3-030-44420-4 |
| Google Scholar Link | https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=1377379502613684024&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 |
| Open Access? | No |
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.