| Author(s) | Allison B Wolf |
| Journal | Hypatia |
| Abstract | Alison Bailey has recently explored the nature of what she calls privilege‐evasive epistemic pushback or “the variety of willful ignorance that many members of dominant groups engage in when they are asked to consider both the lived experience and structural injustices that members of marginalized groups experience daily.” In this article, I want to use Bailey’s argument to demonstrate how privilege‐evasive epistemic pushback is facilitated and obscured by the disciplinary tools of traditional Western philosophy. Specifically, through exploring philosophical cultures of justification and case studies, this work will reveal how students engage in privilege‐evasive epistemic pushback by deploying the reason/emotion divide and various philosophical norms and practices it underlies to protect their epistemic home turf. Then, I offer three emotion‐enhancing critical philosophical practices aimed at disrupting the ignorance‐promoting moves of privilege‐evasive epistemic pushback and, instead, engage emotion as epistemically significant. |
| Keywords | Privilege-evasive epistemic pushback; Willful ignorance; Culture of justification; Reason/emotion divide; Case studies; Emotion-enhancing critical philosophical practices; Philosophical norms This content was generated by artificial intelligence using the text of the original work. |
| Date Published | Fall 2017 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 893-910 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12378 |
| Google Scholar Link | https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=6329577850727362192&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 |
| Open Access? | No |
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.