| Author(s) | Jacqui Poltera |
| Journal | Hypatia |
| Thematic Cluster/Special Issue | Epistemic Justice, Ignorance, and Procedural Objectivity |
| Abstract | The ethos of philosophy is notoriously hostile to women. Highly skilled female thinkers leak out at all stages of the pipeline, and philosophy remains one of the most male-dominated disciplines in the humanities (Norlock 2009, 8). I have two main aims here. First, I explain why we should not take for granted that senior women will be supportive mentors to junior women and thereby plug leaks in the pipeline. More importantly, we should not inadvertently place the onus on them to do so. Second, I argue that we need to consider the possibility that some women contribute to the hostile ethos. Women are as susceptible as men to employing gender schemas (Valian 2005). It is a mistake to presuppose that women philosophers are somehow immune from discriminating against other women, competing with them, and deterring them from entering the field. These facets of the problem form a relatively small but significant contribution to the hostile ethos that we need to acknowledge in our efforts to attract and retain women. Accepting this claim does not detract from the seriousness of longstanding gender discrimination against women, or from a widespread lack of recognition by men of women’s needs and accomplishments in philosophy (Haslanger 2008). |
| Keywords | Gender Bias; Mentorship Dynamics; Female Representation; Hostile Environment; Gender Discrimination; Women in Philosophy; Gender Schemas This content was generated by artificial intelligence using the text of the original work. |
| Date Published | Spring 2011 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 419-428 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01161.x |
| URL | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/hypatia/article/abs/women-and-the-ethos-of-philosophy-shedding-light-on-mentoring-and-competition/ED88881F504B683155DC66D7B6E54B53 |
| Google Scholar Link | https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=7803960986605041027&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 |
| Open Access? | No |
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.