Why is There Female Under-Representation Among Philosophy Majors? Evidence of a Pre-University Effect

Author(s)Sam Baron; Tom Dougherty; Kristie Miller
JournalErgo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
AbstractWhy does female under-representation emerge during undergraduate education? At the University of Sydney, we surveyed students before and after their first philosophy course. We failed to find any evidence that this course disproportionately discouraged female students from continuing in philosophy relative to male students. Instead, we found evidence of an interaction effect between gender and existing attitudes about philosophy coming into tertiary education that appears at least partially responsible for this poor retention. At the first lecture, disproportionately few female students intended to major. Further, at the first lecture, female students were less interested in philosophy, were less self-confident about philosophy, and were less able to imagine themselves as philosophers. Similarly, female students predicted they would feel more uncomfortable in philosophy classes than male students did. Further study with a control is warranted to determine whether this interaction effect is peculiar to philosophy, or whether it is indicative of a more general gendered trend amongst first year undergraduate students.
KeywordsWomen in philosophy; experimental philosophy; gender
Date Published 2015
Volume2
Issue14
Pages329-365
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.014
URLhttps://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ergo/12405314.0002.014?view=text;rgn=main
Google Scholar Linkhttps://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cluster=1262318541238007724&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
Open Access?Yes

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.